Rompimento de barragens em Mariana e Brumadinho (MG): desastres como meio de acumulação por despossessão
The rupture of two dams in Mariana (MG), 2015, and Brumadinho (MG), 2019, cost hundreds of lives and destroyed most of the Rio Doce and Paraopeba basins. These events are the climax of the disasters that began with environmental licensing and continued with the inefficient management of damage repai...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2020 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
| Repositorio: | Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/49836 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doi.org/10.48075/amb.v2i1.23299 http://hdl.handle.net/1843/49836 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3439-084X |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Barragem de rejeito Desastre Acumulação por despossessão Mineração Rompimento de barragem Licenciamento ambiental Barragem Desastres ambientais Minas e mineração Fundão, Barragem de (MG) |
| Sumario: | The rupture of two dams in Mariana (MG), 2015, and Brumadinho (MG), 2019, cost hundreds of lives and destroyed most of the Rio Doce and Paraopeba basins. These events are the climax of the disasters that began with environmental licensing and continued with the inefficient management of damage repair, causing even more social suffering. After the disasters, public institutions did not strengthen the regulatory framework but accelerated its flexibilization. As a result, mining companies are able to introduce the culture of neocoronelism into governance systems. In this way, companies have not only strengthened their interests in the face of victims' demands, but also the territorial control in areas affected by disasters through "hidden land grabbing". |
|---|