Trajectory and mutations of penal utilitarianism: an essay of intellectual history

This text addresses the biography of modern utilitarianism, in a legal and criminal  sense, focusing on three important moments of its development: illustrated  utilitarianism (Bentham and Beccaria), the reformed utilitarianism (ferrajoli), and  the crisis of the utilitarianism ideal in this sense –...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Devos, Bryan Alves, Véras Neto, Francisco Quintanilha
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2019
País:Brasil
Institución:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
Repositorio:Revista Direito GV
Idioma:portugués
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/80278
Acceso en línea:https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/80278
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Penal utilitarianism
intellectual history
critical criminology
abolitionism
marginal realism
Utilitarismo penal
história das ideias
criminologia crítica
abolicionismo
realismo marginal
Descripción
Sumario:This text addresses the biography of modern utilitarianism, in a legal and criminal  sense, focusing on three important moments of its development: illustrated  utilitarianism (Bentham and Beccaria), the reformed utilitarianism (ferrajoli), and  the crisis of the utilitarianism ideal in this sense – this last one exposed by the  minimalist and abolitionist branches of critical criminology. The theoretical  instrument used is the one of historiography of ideas, so that the foundations of  punishment – in the case of this investigation: negative general prevention and  prevention of arbitrary penalties – conform to a typology of responses designed  to elucidate the perennial question “why punish?”, without losing sight of the constancy  of this debate (until now unresolved). in the end, a possible answer is suggested  based on the considerations of marginal realism (Zaffaroni) in order to  identify the limits of utilitarianism, but also to outline some conditions that  enable the maintenance of its assumptions in criminal law.