The Overarching Doctrines and the Public Sphere in John Rawls's Political Liberalism

The text analyzes how comprehensive doctrines participate in the public reason within John Rawls' Political Liberalism, as well as the criticisms towards the limits Rawls imposes on the involvement of these doctrines in the public sphere. Questions have arisen about whether political liberalism...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Gonçalves Sobreira, Antonio, Dias do Carmo, Luís Alexandre
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:Brasil
Institución:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
Repositorio:Revista de Filosofia Moderna e Contemporânea
Idioma:portugués
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/50558
Acceso en línea:https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/fmc/article/view/50558
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:John Rawls. Liberalismo político. Doutrinas abrangentes. Consenso sobreposto. Esfera pública.
John Rawls. Political liberalism. Comprehensive doctrines. Overlapping consensus. Public sphere.
John Rawls. Libéralisme politique. Doctrines globales. Consensus chevauchant. Sphère publique.
id BR_96b4e2a1104c0c7dfc67ad31a4a88848
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/50558
network_acronym_str BR
network_name_str Brasil
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Overarching Doctrines and the Public Sphere in John Rawls's Political Liberalism
LES DOCTRINES GLOBALES ET LA SPHÈRE PUBLIQUE DANS LE LIBÉRALISME POLITIQUE DE JOHN RAWLS
As Doutrinas Abrangentes e o Âmbito Público no Liberalismo Político de John Rawls
title The Overarching Doctrines and the Public Sphere in John Rawls's Political Liberalism
spellingShingle The Overarching Doctrines and the Public Sphere in John Rawls's Political Liberalism
Gonçalves Sobreira, Antonio
John Rawls. Liberalismo político. Doutrinas abrangentes. Consenso sobreposto. Esfera pública.
John Rawls. Political liberalism. Comprehensive doctrines. Overlapping consensus. Public sphere.
John Rawls. Libéralisme politique. Doctrines globales. Consensus chevauchant. Sphère publique.
title_short The Overarching Doctrines and the Public Sphere in John Rawls's Political Liberalism
title_full The Overarching Doctrines and the Public Sphere in John Rawls's Political Liberalism
title_fullStr The Overarching Doctrines and the Public Sphere in John Rawls's Political Liberalism
title_full_unstemmed The Overarching Doctrines and the Public Sphere in John Rawls's Political Liberalism
title_sort The Overarching Doctrines and the Public Sphere in John Rawls's Political Liberalism
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Gonçalves Sobreira, Antonio
Dias do Carmo, Luís Alexandre
author Gonçalves Sobreira, Antonio
author_facet Gonçalves Sobreira, Antonio
Dias do Carmo, Luís Alexandre
author_role author
author2 Dias do Carmo, Luís Alexandre
author2_role author
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv John Rawls. Liberalismo político. Doutrinas abrangentes. Consenso sobreposto. Esfera pública.
John Rawls. Political liberalism. Comprehensive doctrines. Overlapping consensus. Public sphere.
John Rawls. Libéralisme politique. Doctrines globales. Consensus chevauchant. Sphère publique.
topic John Rawls. Liberalismo político. Doutrinas abrangentes. Consenso sobreposto. Esfera pública.
John Rawls. Political liberalism. Comprehensive doctrines. Overlapping consensus. Public sphere.
John Rawls. Libéralisme politique. Doctrines globales. Consensus chevauchant. Sphère publique.
description The text analyzes how comprehensive doctrines participate in the public reason within John Rawls' Political Liberalism, as well as the criticisms towards the limits Rawls imposes on the involvement of these doctrines in the public sphere. Questions have arisen about whether political liberalism might be overly restrictive towards religions, casting doubt on its ability to achieve a truly just society. The article explores the boundaries of public reason in Rawls' conception, aiming to establish common ground for public debate; it acknowledges the criticisms put forth by M. Sandel and some responses formulated by Rawls. The objective is to examine the arguments for and against Rawls' proposed restriction, evaluating its implications for public discourse in a pluralistic society. The article seeks to comprehend the restrictions imposed by public reason on comprehensive doctrines and how they are justified within a constitutional democracy, which must respect fundamental liberties. By delving into these issues, the article contributes to understanding Rawls' thought and the contemporary discussions regarding the participation of comprehensive doctrines in the public sphere.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-08-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/fmc/article/view/50558
10.26512/rfmc.v11i1.50558
url https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/fmc/article/view/50558
identifier_str_mv 10.26512/rfmc.v11i1.50558
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/fmc/article/view/50558/40876
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista de Filosofia Moderna e Contemporânea
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista de Filosofia Moderna e Contemporânea
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Filosofia da Universidade de Brasília
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Filosofia da Universidade de Brasília
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Modern and Contemporary Philosophy; Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023): Filosofia Francesa; 95 - 118
Revista de Filosofia Moderna e Contemporânea; Vol. 11 Núm. 1 (2023): Filosofia Francesa; 95 - 118
Revista de Filosofia Moderna e Contemporânea; v. 11 n. 1 (2023): Filosofia Francesa; 95 - 118
2317-9570
10.26512/rfmc.v11i1
reponame:Revista de Filosofia Moderna e Contemporânea
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Revista de Filosofia Moderna e Contemporânea
collection Revista de Filosofia Moderna e Contemporânea
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Filosofia Moderna e Contemporânea - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv periodicos.bce@unb.br | rfmc.ppgfilunb@gmail.com | hahn.alexandre@gmail.com
_version_ 1853666539514888192
spelling The Overarching Doctrines and the Public Sphere in John Rawls's Political LiberalismLES DOCTRINES GLOBALES ET LA SPHÈRE PUBLIQUE DANS LE LIBÉRALISME POLITIQUE DE JOHN RAWLSAs Doutrinas Abrangentes e o Âmbito Público no Liberalismo Político de John RawlsJohn Rawls. Liberalismo político. Doutrinas abrangentes. Consenso sobreposto. Esfera pública.John Rawls. Political liberalism. Comprehensive doctrines. Overlapping consensus. Public sphere.John Rawls. Libéralisme politique. Doctrines globales. Consensus chevauchant. Sphère publique.The text analyzes how comprehensive doctrines participate in the public reason within John Rawls' Political Liberalism, as well as the criticisms towards the limits Rawls imposes on the involvement of these doctrines in the public sphere. Questions have arisen about whether political liberalism might be overly restrictive towards religions, casting doubt on its ability to achieve a truly just society. The article explores the boundaries of public reason in Rawls' conception, aiming to establish common ground for public debate; it acknowledges the criticisms put forth by M. Sandel and some responses formulated by Rawls. The objective is to examine the arguments for and against Rawls' proposed restriction, evaluating its implications for public discourse in a pluralistic society. The article seeks to comprehend the restrictions imposed by public reason on comprehensive doctrines and how they are justified within a constitutional democracy, which must respect fundamental liberties. By delving into these issues, the article contributes to understanding Rawls' thought and the contemporary discussions regarding the participation of comprehensive doctrines in the public sphere.Le texte analise comment les doctrines globales participent de la raison publique dans le libéralisme politique de John Rawls, ainsi que les critiques sur les limites imposées par Rawls à la participation de ces doctrines dans le domaine public. Des questionnements sont apparus sur le fait que le libéralisme politique serait excessivement restrictif envers les religions, soulevant des doutes quant à sa capacité à atteindre une société véritablement juste. L'article explore les limites de la raison publique dans la conception de Rawls, en cherchant à établir un terrain commun pour le débat public ; il examine les critiques présentées par M. Sandel et certaines réponses élaborées par Rawls. L'objectif est d'analyser les arguments en faveur et contre la restriction proposée par Rawls, en évaluant leurs implications pour le débat public dans une société pluraliste. On cherche à comprendre les restrictions imposées par la raison publique aux doctrines globales et la manière dont elles sont justifiées dans une démocratie constitutionnelle qui doit respecter les libertés fondamentales. En explorant ces questions, l'article contribue à la compréhension de la pensée de Rawls et des débats contemporains sur la participation des doctrines globales dans la sphère publique.O texto analisa como as doutrinas abrangentes participam da razão pública no Liberalismo Político de John Rawls, bem como as críticas aos limites que Rawls impõe à participação dessas doutrinas no âmbito público. Surgiram questionamentos sobre se o liberalismo político seria excessivamente restritivo em relação às religiões, levantando dúvidas sobre sua capacidade de alcançar uma sociedade verdadeiramente justa. O artigo explora os limites da razão pública na concepção de Rawls, ao buscar estabelecer um terreno comum para o debate público; conhece as críticas apresentadas por M. Sandel e algumas respostas elaboradas por Rawls. O objetivo é analisar os argumentos a favor e contra a restrição proposta por Rawls, avaliando suas implicações para o debate público em uma sociedade pluralista. Busca-se compreender as restrições impostas pela razão pública às doutrinas abrangentes e a forma como são justificadas em uma democracia constitucional, que precisa respeitar as liberdades fundamentais. Ao explorar essas questões, o artigo contribui para o entendimento do pensamento de Rawls e das discussões contemporâneas sobre a participação das doutrinas abrangentes na esfera pública.Departamento de Filosofia da Universidade de Brasília2024-08-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/fmc/article/view/5055810.26512/rfmc.v11i1.50558Journal of Modern and Contemporary Philosophy; Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023): Filosofia Francesa; 95 - 118Revista de Filosofia Moderna e Contemporânea; Vol. 11 Núm. 1 (2023): Filosofia Francesa; 95 - 118Revista de Filosofia Moderna e Contemporânea; v. 11 n. 1 (2023): Filosofia Francesa; 95 - 1182317-957010.26512/rfmc.v11i1reponame:Revista de Filosofia Moderna e Contemporâneainstname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/fmc/article/view/50558/40876Copyright (c) 2023 Revista de Filosofia Moderna e Contemporâneainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGonçalves Sobreira, AntonioDias do Carmo, Luís Alexandre2024-10-14T18:52:48Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/50558Revistahttp://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/fmc/indexPUBhttp://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/fmc/oaiperiodicos.bce@unb.br | rfmc.ppgfilunb@gmail.com | hahn.alexandre@gmail.com2317-95702317-9570opendoar:2024-10-14T18:52:48Revista de Filosofia Moderna e Contemporânea - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
score 15,301629

Similares en LA Referencia