RELAÇÃO ENTRE A HEURÍSTICA DO EXCESSO DE CONFIANÇA E O PERFIL DE INVESTIDOR.
The present study focuses on analyzing the phenomenon known as "Overconfidence" in students enrolled in technical courses in the field of Management in a city in the interior of São Paulo. The central objective is to investigate whether different types of investors (conservative, moderate,...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT) |
| Repositorio: | Revista Estudos e Pesquisas em Administração |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br:article/16842 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br/ojs/index.php/repad/article/view/16842 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Excesso de confiança Finanças comportamentais Perfil do investidor Overconfidence Behavioral finance Investor profile |
| Sumario: | The present study focuses on analyzing the phenomenon known as "Overconfidence" in students enrolled in technical courses in the field of Management in a city in the interior of São Paulo. The central objective is to investigate whether different types of investors (conservative, moderate, and aggressive) exhibit variations in the level of this overconfidence. To achieve this goal, a questionnaire was administered to 162 participants, who were grouped according to their investment profiles. The methodological approach employed involved the use of procedures proposed by Gigerenzer e Kleinbölting (1991) and Baratella (2007), in addition to the application of the Wilcoxon test. The purpose behind the selection of these methods was to confirm the presence or absence of the overconfidence phenomenon in investors' profiles. Furthermore, for a more in-depth examination of differences between the three types of profiles, the Kruskal-Wallis test was also employed. This statistical test aims to assess whether there are significant discrepancies in the distributions of overconfidence among the different groups of investors. The results of the analysis and statistical evaluation led to the conclusion that there is not enough evidence to assert that the three investor profiles have significant disparities in terms of the distribution of overconfidence. |
|---|