Methodological pathway for instrument validation in engineering research

The process of validating measurement instruments is fundamental to research, especially in engineering, to ensure that the data obtained is reliable. This process consists of two main phases: a qualitative and a quantitative one. The qualitative phase is based on the judgment of experts, who evalua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Abanto Duran, Roger Francisco, Cabrera Sernaque , Flor Rosmery, González Sánchez , José Luis, Ruiz Sirlopu , José Ronald, Rodríguez Moncada , Juan José
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2026
País:Perú
Institución:Universidad Nacional de Jaén
Repositorio:Pakamuros
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:unj:article/835
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unj.edu.pe/index.php/pakamuros/article/view/835
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Aiken’s V Coefficient; Cronbach’s Alpha; Normality Test.
coeficiente V de Aiken
alfa de Cronbach
prueba de normalidad
id PE_f447d9c7aaab7c748fbd3c0ba90679ea
oai_identifier_str oai:unj:article/835
network_acronym_str PE
network_name_str Perú
repository_id_str
spelling Methodological pathway for instrument validation in engineering researchRuta metodológica para la validación de instrumentos en investigación de ingenieríaAbanto Duran, Roger FranciscoCabrera Sernaque , Flor RosmeryGonzález Sánchez , José Luis Ruiz Sirlopu , José RonaldRodríguez Moncada , Juan JoséAiken’s V Coefficient; Cronbach’s Alpha; Normality Test.coeficiente V de Aikenalfa de Cronbachprueba de normalidadThe process of validating measurement instruments is fundamental to research, especially in engineering, to ensure that the data obtained is reliable. This process consists of two main phases: a qualitative and a quantitative one. The qualitative phase is based on the judgment of experts, who evaluate the instrument's relevance. To quantify this consensus and reduce subjectivity, Aiken's V coefficient is used. Subsequently, the quantitative phase focuses on measuring the instrument's internal reliability using Cronbach's Alpha, with an acceptable value between 0.7 and 0.9. After validation, the normality of the data is evaluated using tests such as Shapiro-Wilk for small samples (less than 50) or Kolmogorov-Smirnov for large samples (50 or more). This evaluation is crucial for selecting the appropriate statistical tests: if the data follows a normal distribution, parametric tests like the t-Student are applied; otherwise, non-parametric tests like the Mann-Whitney U are chosen.El proceso de validación de instrumentos de medición es fundamental en la investigación, particularmente en el campo de la ingeniería, para garantizar que los datos obtenidos sean confiables, este proceso consta de dos fases principales: una cualitativa y una cuantitativa, la fase cualitativa se basa en el juicio de expertos, quienes evalúan la pertinencia del instrumento, para cuantificar este consenso y reducir la subjetividad, se emplea el coeficiente V de Aiken, posteriormente, la fase cuantitativa se enfoca en medir la fiabilidad interna del instrumento utilizando el Alfa de Cronbach, con un valor aceptable entre 0.7 y 0.9 tras la validación, se evalúa la normalidad de los datos utilizando pruebas como la de Shapiro-Wilk para muestras pequeñas (menos de 50) o la de Kolmogorov-Smirnov para muestras grandes (50 o más), esta evaluación es crucial para la selección de las pruebas estadísticas adecuadas: si los datos siguen una distribución normal, se aplican pruebas paramétricas como la t de Student; de lo contrario, se opta por pruebas no paramétricas como la U de Mann-Whitney.Universidad Nacional de Jaén2026-01-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmltext/xmlapplication/epub+zipaudio/mpeghttps://revistas.unj.edu.pe/index.php/pakamuros/article/view/83510.37787/z2whae41Pakamuros Scientific Journal; Vol. 13 No. 4 (2025): Revista Científica Pakamuros; 94-115Revista Científica Pakamuros; Vol. 13 Núm. 4 (2025): Revista Científica Pakamuros; 94-1152522-32402306-980510.37787/xz9w9e93reponame:Pakamurosinstname:Universidad Nacional de Jaéninstacron:UNJspahttps://revistas.unj.edu.pe/index.php/pakamuros/article/view/835/761https://revistas.unj.edu.pe/index.php/pakamuros/article/view/835/762https://revistas.unj.edu.pe/index.php/pakamuros/article/view/835/764https://revistas.unj.edu.pe/index.php/pakamuros/article/view/835/765https://revistas.unj.edu.pe/index.php/pakamuros/article/view/835/766Derechos de autor 2026 Revista Científica Pakamuroshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:unj:article/8352026-01-06T22:09:29Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Methodological pathway for instrument validation in engineering research
Ruta metodológica para la validación de instrumentos en investigación de ingeniería
title Methodological pathway for instrument validation in engineering research
spellingShingle Methodological pathway for instrument validation in engineering research
Abanto Duran, Roger Francisco
Aiken’s V Coefficient; Cronbach’s Alpha; Normality Test.
coeficiente V de Aiken
alfa de Cronbach
prueba de normalidad
title_short Methodological pathway for instrument validation in engineering research
title_full Methodological pathway for instrument validation in engineering research
title_fullStr Methodological pathway for instrument validation in engineering research
title_full_unstemmed Methodological pathway for instrument validation in engineering research
title_sort Methodological pathway for instrument validation in engineering research
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Abanto Duran, Roger Francisco
Cabrera Sernaque , Flor Rosmery
González Sánchez , José Luis
Ruiz Sirlopu , José Ronald
Rodríguez Moncada , Juan José
author Abanto Duran, Roger Francisco
author_facet Abanto Duran, Roger Francisco
Cabrera Sernaque , Flor Rosmery
González Sánchez , José Luis
Ruiz Sirlopu , José Ronald
Rodríguez Moncada , Juan José
author_role author
author2 Cabrera Sernaque , Flor Rosmery
González Sánchez , José Luis
Ruiz Sirlopu , José Ronald
Rodríguez Moncada , Juan José
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Aiken’s V Coefficient; Cronbach’s Alpha; Normality Test.
coeficiente V de Aiken
alfa de Cronbach
prueba de normalidad
topic Aiken’s V Coefficient; Cronbach’s Alpha; Normality Test.
coeficiente V de Aiken
alfa de Cronbach
prueba de normalidad
description The process of validating measurement instruments is fundamental to research, especially in engineering, to ensure that the data obtained is reliable. This process consists of two main phases: a qualitative and a quantitative one. The qualitative phase is based on the judgment of experts, who evaluate the instrument's relevance. To quantify this consensus and reduce subjectivity, Aiken's V coefficient is used. Subsequently, the quantitative phase focuses on measuring the instrument's internal reliability using Cronbach's Alpha, with an acceptable value between 0.7 and 0.9. After validation, the normality of the data is evaluated using tests such as Shapiro-Wilk for small samples (less than 50) or Kolmogorov-Smirnov for large samples (50 or more). This evaluation is crucial for selecting the appropriate statistical tests: if the data follows a normal distribution, parametric tests like the t-Student are applied; otherwise, non-parametric tests like the Mann-Whitney U are chosen.
publishDate 2026
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2026-01-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.unj.edu.pe/index.php/pakamuros/article/view/835
10.37787/z2whae41
url https://revistas.unj.edu.pe/index.php/pakamuros/article/view/835
identifier_str_mv 10.37787/z2whae41
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.unj.edu.pe/index.php/pakamuros/article/view/835/761
https://revistas.unj.edu.pe/index.php/pakamuros/article/view/835/762
https://revistas.unj.edu.pe/index.php/pakamuros/article/view/835/764
https://revistas.unj.edu.pe/index.php/pakamuros/article/view/835/765
https://revistas.unj.edu.pe/index.php/pakamuros/article/view/835/766
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2026 Revista Científica Pakamuros
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2026 Revista Científica Pakamuros
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
text/xml
application/epub+zip
audio/mpeg
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional de Jaén
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional de Jaén
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pakamuros Scientific Journal; Vol. 13 No. 4 (2025): Revista Científica Pakamuros; 94-115
Revista Científica Pakamuros; Vol. 13 Núm. 4 (2025): Revista Científica Pakamuros; 94-115
2522-3240
2306-9805
10.37787/xz9w9e93
reponame:Pakamuros
instname:Universidad Nacional de Jaén
instacron:UNJ
instname_str Universidad Nacional de Jaén
instacron_str UNJ
institution UNJ
reponame_str Pakamuros
collection Pakamuros
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1863016213230125056
score 15,812429

Similares en LA Referencia