Playing with precedents: rules. analogies, principles
THIS ARTICLE ANALYSES THE USE OF BINDING PRECEDENTS BY THE BRAZILIAN SUPREME COURT IN THE LIGHT OF THREE CONCEPTIONS OF PRECEDENTS, WHICH ARE DEVELOPED BY F. SCHAUER (PRECEDENTS AS RULES), C. SUNSTEIN (PRECEDENTS AS ANALOGIES) AND R. DWORKIN (PRECEDENTS AS PRINCIPLES). AFTER THE EXPOSITION OF THE MA...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2012 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
| Repositorio: | Revista Direito GV |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/23926 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/23926 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | PRECEDENTS BRAZILIAN SUPREME COURT BINDING PRECEDENTS PRECEDENTES SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL SÚMULAS VINCULANTES |
| Sumario: | THIS ARTICLE ANALYSES THE USE OF BINDING PRECEDENTS BY THE BRAZILIAN SUPREME COURT IN THE LIGHT OF THREE CONCEPTIONS OF PRECEDENTS, WHICH ARE DEVELOPED BY F. SCHAUER (PRECEDENTS AS RULES), C. SUNSTEIN (PRECEDENTS AS ANALOGIES) AND R. DWORKIN (PRECEDENTS AS PRINCIPLES). AFTER THE EXPOSITION OF THE MAIN ASPECTS OF EACH THEORY, BASED RESPECTIVELY ON THE CONCEPTS OF ENTRENCHED GENERALIZATIONS, INCOMPLETELY THEORIZED AGREEMENTS AND CHAIN NOVEL, THE ARTICLE DEBATES THE ARGUMENTS THAT THEY CAN PROVIDE FOR THE USE OF PRECEDENTS IN BRAZILIAN LAW |
|---|